Current events

I work from home.  When my husband is at work and my kids are at school, the house is sometimes too quiet, so I keep the TV on, on low volume, because the background noise is helpful.  I'm usually tuned to MSNBC, alternating occasionally with the local all-news channel.

Even though I don't actually watch most of the time (I usually sit with my back to the TV), the talk still enters my brain, which means that I know more about politics right now than I necessarily want to.  I was shocked last week when my husband, commenting on the New Hampshire primary results, asked me who John Kasich was.   He's an intelligent and reasonably well-informed person, but he'd never heard of John Kasich; didn't even know that he was running.  

Right now, MSNBC and every other news network are covering the death of Antonin Scalia and the emerging fight over whether or not the President should appoint a replacement and whether or not the Senate will allow a nomination to come to a vote.  Anyone who wonders why most Americans now hate both parties needs only to watch five minutes' worth of Scalia coverage.  The poor guy's body probably isn't even cold yet, and the politicking is fully underway. 

I'm on both sides of this issue.  As a pro-life person, I don't necessarily want to see another Obama appointee to the Supreme Court; however, I also don't think that the Supreme Court is actually that important.  The misbegotten idea of abortion as some sort of human right took hold over a period of 50 years or so.  People who still believe that abortion is anything except a horror for women and for humanity aren't going to change their minds because of a court decision or a political fiat.   

On the other hand, it seems pretty clear that President Obama, who has almost a year more to serve, should appoint Scalia's replacement. It is also manifestly and transparently obvious that if the current lame-duck President were a Republican and not a Democrat, then Cruz, Kasich, Rubio and the rest of them would be vigorously defending that President's right to appoint the next Justice, and would be asserting his Constitutional responsibility to do so with dispatch.  And, in that very same hypothetical case, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and the rest of THAT gang would be expressing fake outrage over the supposed power grab of a sitting President making a judicial appointment and would similarly threaten to delay, filibuster, or otherwise stymie the process.

I don't remember exactly when the term "litmus test" began to be used in discussions of judicial appointees' views on abortion.  Sometime in the 1980s, I think.  I also don't recall having heard of a litmus test applied to any judicial nominee's views on eminent domain, say, or Fifth Amendment rights, or interstate commerce, or even gun rights.  Only for abortion, it seems, are both sides, but especially the pro-choice side, so determined to try to guess the potential candidates' views to be sure that they'll vote the right way.  On the pro-choice side, I think, it's because there's no other way to sustain the whole monstrous lie--that abortion is about women's rights, or that a fetus is anything other than a human being--than to prop it up with phony "settled law," ideally by appointing young judges who are likely to sit on the bench for the next 20 years or so.  Then keep sharpening the "choice" and "war on women" rhetoric during that 20 years, and hopefully, you'll fool just enough people that the next generation will produce politicians who will do what's necessary to sustain the lie for the next 20 years or so after that. 

Right now, on social media, smug pro-choicers are circulating a meme that reads something like "Justice Scalia expressed a wish to be cremated; however, women will need to meet first to decide if that's what's really best for his body." Hilarious!  Gotcha!  I really NAILED those idiot pro-lifers this time; they can't argue with that!  Except for this: Justice Scalia is already dead, and abortion, of course involves two bodies, not just one, both of which are alive, at least until Planned Parenthood gets hold of them.  Right-wing social media friends are just as bad; they're flooding Facebook with rumors that Scalia was murdered by nefarious pro-choicers and gay rights activists.  Sleep with one eye open, Justices Thomas, Alito, and Roberts, because I suppose you're all next. 

And that leads right back to what's wrong with politics right now.  Nothing can be solved with politics, because politics is about nothing but politics, and no one on either side actually cares about truth.  The people in power care only about holding onto power, and the fight is about only the fight.  The politicians all know this and they have known it for some time.  Unfortunately for them, people are beginning to catch on.  Unfortunately for all of us, the people who are catching on are in reaction mode; nothing else can explain the rise of Donald Trump.  Maybe it will take two years, or maybe five, but it's entirely likely that sometime in the not-all-that-distant future, the debate over Supreme Court appointments and filibusters will seem quaintly nostalgic, because the Constitution and the United States as we know them now won't even exist.   Or maybe I just need to get out more.