Gaslight

We have gas lamps in our neighborhood; real, old-fashioned gas lamps that turn on automatically at twilight and remain softly lit until sunrise the next morning.   The light is beautiful and atmospheric (though not really authentically atmospheric, since my neighborhood was built by Levitt Brothers in the mid 1960s.) They're also useful.  A few years ago, we were plagued with frequent power failures, and the gas lamps were the only available light during those times.  Of course, if a gas lamp is on your property, as in our case, you have to pay for the gas.  Some of our neighbors have gotten rid of their gas lamps for that reason; we like ours so much, though, that we've never bothered to really analyze how much it affects our gas bill.

*****

If you want to write a novel, you have to read novels, and a lot of them.  This isn't hard for me. I still read novels for the story and for the characters, but I also like to study the differences between one approach and another.

For example, Rebecca West versus Penelope Fitzgerald, not that I compare myself to either of them, since they were two of the greatest writers of the 20th century.  I just finished Fitzgerald's The Beginning of Spring, which takes place in Russia just before the revolution.  It's hard to imagine that anyone could write anything about early 20th century Russia in fewer than 1000 pages, but The Beginning of Spring is just barely 200 pages, and it's really a novel, not just an overly long short story or novella. Fitzgerald was a late-in-life novelist, and I have to wonder if she didn't spend years writing this and her other novels in her head before finally setting them down on paper.  Because in her novels, including The Beginning of Spring, the reader understands the story and the characters and the conflict (though not how it will be resolved) almost from the first page.  There's nothing gradual; you're immersed in this very foreign world (and apparently, Fitzgerald herself never even visited Russia) from the very first moment.

Rebecca West's The Fountain Overflows, on the other hand, is over 400 pages long, and it meanders for the first 150 or so.  I love Rebecca West; I've read The Thinking Reed at least three times, and Black Lamb and Grey Falcon is one of the best books, in any genre, of the 20th century.  And I'm usually (not always, but usually) extremely reluctant to abandon a book once I reading it, but I almost made an exception for this one.  I'm glad I stayed with it, though.   The story really picks up momentum about a third of the way through, and then it doesn't let go.

The Fountain Overflows is about an Edwardian family who were apparently very much like West's own family.  The book was written many years later, after World War II, and is told in the first person by Rose, one of three sisters whose father is a brilliant but careless writer, and whose mother was a concert pianist in her youth.  Rose, who is also telling the story from the perspective of late adulthood many years after the events of the story take place, is neither nostalgic nor sentimental.  She's just aware that the world in which she grew up is irretrievably gone, and that no one other than her father was aware that their world was endangered until it was too late.  I'm a little slow on the uptake sometimes, so it took me a while to figure out why Rose keeps mentioning the gas lamps in her family's house. Light from gas lamps is softer, less harsh and glaring, then light from electric lamps. But once the electric lamps took over, gas light was gone, almost for good, except for decorative purposes, just like my gas lamp.  I suppose that someone who spent years studying to earn an English degree should recognize an extended metaphor before it has to come and beat her over the head, but I learn everything the hard way.

*****

The Beginning of Spring (and it just occurred to me now that this title might have been ironic--again, slow on the uptake) and The Fountain Overflows are very different books, with one very big thing in common.  Both books take place in worlds that will soon vanish, completely and violently, and the occupants of those worlds are mostly completely unaware of what's about to happen.  This seems relevant right now, for some weird reason.

Current events

I work from home.  When my husband is at work and my kids are at school, the house is sometimes too quiet, so I keep the TV on, on low volume, because the background noise is helpful.  I'm usually tuned to MSNBC, alternating occasionally with the local all-news channel.

Even though I don't actually watch most of the time (I usually sit with my back to the TV), the talk still enters my brain, which means that I know more about politics right now than I necessarily want to.  I was shocked last week when my husband, commenting on the New Hampshire primary results, asked me who John Kasich was.   He's an intelligent and reasonably well-informed person, but he'd never heard of John Kasich; didn't even know that he was running.  

Right now, MSNBC and every other news network are covering the death of Antonin Scalia and the emerging fight over whether or not the President should appoint a replacement and whether or not the Senate will allow a nomination to come to a vote.  Anyone who wonders why most Americans now hate both parties needs only to watch five minutes' worth of Scalia coverage.  The poor guy's body probably isn't even cold yet, and the politicking is fully underway. 

I'm on both sides of this issue.  As a pro-life person, I don't necessarily want to see another Obama appointee to the Supreme Court; however, I also don't think that the Supreme Court is actually that important.  The misbegotten idea of abortion as some sort of human right took hold over a period of 50 years or so.  People who still believe that abortion is anything except a horror for women and for humanity aren't going to change their minds because of a court decision or a political fiat.   

On the other hand, it seems pretty clear that President Obama, who has almost a year more to serve, should appoint Scalia's replacement. It is also manifestly and transparently obvious that if the current lame-duck President were a Republican and not a Democrat, then Cruz, Kasich, Rubio and the rest of them would be vigorously defending that President's right to appoint the next Justice, and would be asserting his Constitutional responsibility to do so with dispatch.  And, in that very same hypothetical case, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and the rest of THAT gang would be expressing fake outrage over the supposed power grab of a sitting President making a judicial appointment and would similarly threaten to delay, filibuster, or otherwise stymie the process.

I don't remember exactly when the term "litmus test" began to be used in discussions of judicial appointees' views on abortion.  Sometime in the 1980s, I think.  I also don't recall having heard of a litmus test applied to any judicial nominee's views on eminent domain, say, or Fifth Amendment rights, or interstate commerce, or even gun rights.  Only for abortion, it seems, are both sides, but especially the pro-choice side, so determined to try to guess the potential candidates' views to be sure that they'll vote the right way.  On the pro-choice side, I think, it's because there's no other way to sustain the whole monstrous lie--that abortion is about women's rights, or that a fetus is anything other than a human being--than to prop it up with phony "settled law," ideally by appointing young judges who are likely to sit on the bench for the next 20 years or so.  Then keep sharpening the "choice" and "war on women" rhetoric during that 20 years, and hopefully, you'll fool just enough people that the next generation will produce politicians who will do what's necessary to sustain the lie for the next 20 years or so after that. 

Right now, on social media, smug pro-choicers are circulating a meme that reads something like "Justice Scalia expressed a wish to be cremated; however, women will need to meet first to decide if that's what's really best for his body." Hilarious!  Gotcha!  I really NAILED those idiot pro-lifers this time; they can't argue with that!  Except for this: Justice Scalia is already dead, and abortion, of course involves two bodies, not just one, both of which are alive, at least until Planned Parenthood gets hold of them.  Right-wing social media friends are just as bad; they're flooding Facebook with rumors that Scalia was murdered by nefarious pro-choicers and gay rights activists.  Sleep with one eye open, Justices Thomas, Alito, and Roberts, because I suppose you're all next. 

And that leads right back to what's wrong with politics right now.  Nothing can be solved with politics, because politics is about nothing but politics, and no one on either side actually cares about truth.  The people in power care only about holding onto power, and the fight is about only the fight.  The politicians all know this and they have known it for some time.  Unfortunately for them, people are beginning to catch on.  Unfortunately for all of us, the people who are catching on are in reaction mode; nothing else can explain the rise of Donald Trump.  Maybe it will take two years, or maybe five, but it's entirely likely that sometime in the not-all-that-distant future, the debate over Supreme Court appointments and filibusters will seem quaintly nostalgic, because the Constitution and the United States as we know them now won't even exist.   Or maybe I just need to get out more. 

Bibliography

I don't really keep a diary or a journal, other than this silly thing, but I do make lists. Most of my lists are of the to-do variety, but I also keep longer-term lists, including lists of books that I've read.

My 2015 list was long, and now that I look at it, kind of crazy. Apparently, I'll read just about anything. Most of these books were library book sale books, purchased for less than a dollar.  A few of them made enough of an impression that I actually wrote about them; on the other hand, a few of them made so little impression that I forgot about having read them until I re-read my list.  The rest of them fall somewhere between those two extremes.  My 2015 list: 

The Gulag Archipelago, Alexander Solzhenitsyn.  I had to look up the English spelling of his name, again. 

Collected Letters of C.S. Lewis, Volume III, C.S. Lewis

Holy Days and Gospel Reflections, Heather King Read her blog, and then read everything else she has ever written. 

Men at Arms, Evelyn Waugh

Officers and Gentlemen, Evelyn Waugh

The End of the Battle, Evelyn Waugh

That Hideous Strength, C.S. Lewis

Wallenberg, Kati Marton.  No good deed goes unpunished. 

Anthem, Ayn Rand. Silly.  Just ridiculous.  I had never read anything of Ayn Rand's and felt that I should. Too stupid for words. 

How to be a Woman, Caitlin Moran.  1/3 genuinely funny and heartfelt memoir; 2/3 beat-you-over-the-head doctrinaire feminism. The 2/3 part made me tired. 

Whose Body? Dorothy L. Sayers

The Elements of Style, E.B. White and William Strunk, Jr. 

Eats, Shoots, and Leaves, Lynne Truss.  I approve of a zero-tolerance approach to punctuation. 

Eminent Victorians, Lytton Strachey

American Heritage History of the United States, Douglas Brinkley

De Profundis, Oscar Wilde

Sometimes I Feel Like a Nut, Jill Kargman

The Lords of Discipline, Pat Conroy. This was one of my 14-year-old's summer reading selections--we took turns.  

The Soviet Communist Party, Ronald J. Hill and Peter Frank.  I don't know what I was thinking.  Lent maybe?  Penance?  Anyway, I knew more about the Soviet Communist Party after I read this than before I had read it. So there's that. 

To Asmara, Thomas Keneally

Offshore, Penelope Fitzgerald. My favorite Penelope Fitzgerald, but they're all so good.  I don't know how she did it. 

Circle of Friends, Maeve Binchy

Tales of the City, Armistead Maupin. I liked this so much better than I expected to. 

Who Killed My Daughter? Lois Duncan. I loved Lois Duncan's paranormal YA novels when I was growing up, and was so sorry to learn that her daughter had been murdered.  Sadly, this book is a scatter-brained foray into occult psychic phenomena, and I couldn't finish reading it. Too crazy. 

The Secret Letters, Abby Bardi.  Abby Bardi was one of my college instructors; I took three classes with her.  I liked this novel a lot; believable and very funny. 

People I Want to Punch in the Throat, Jen Mann

Memories of the Good and the Great, Alistair Cooke

The Worst-Case Scenario Handbook, Joshua Piven and David Borgenicht

The Chaneysville Incident, David Bradley

If You Can't Say Something Nice, Calvin Trillin. Useful 1980s political and cultural background for something I'm writing. 

A Way of Life Like Any Other, Darcy O'Brien

Life Lessons from the Hiding Place, Pamela Rosewell Moore

The Loved One, Evelyn Waugh

Well, that actually looks even weirder in (electronic) print than it does in my chicken-scratchy handwriting in the back of my 2015 planner.  Not really a unifying theme here, although the list does tend to skew in favor of dead English authors and 20th century killing fields.  The party never stops.